VOL. 1, NO. 1
TWO PENCE
LONDON • WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2025
In a move hailed by scientists as both daring and democratic, the American concern known as OpenAI has this week released the inner workings — the "weights," as engineers put it — of two of its newest reasoning engines.
These calculating machines, christened GPT-OSS-120B and GPT-OSS-20B, are said to rival the finest electronic minds presently available, and have been offered under what the company terms an "Apache 2.0 licence," meaning they may be studied, adapted, and deployed without fee.
It is the first time in five years that OpenAI has unlatched the door to its intellectual workshop, the last such occurrence being the release of GPT-2 in 2019. In recent years, the firm has jealously guarded its most powerful machines, citing both commercial advantage and the grave risk of misuse.
Now, however, there is a perceptible change in the wind. Observers suggest that growing competition — with rivals such as Meta and DeepSeek unveiling their own "open-source" marvels — has spurred OpenAI to act, lest it be seen as lagging behind.
"Thinking Machine" - 1955
Professor Harold Smythe of Cambridge, interviewed yesterday, declared:
"It is rather as if Rolls-Royce had handed out blueprints for its jet engines. This generosity of spirit, if genuine, could accelerate research across the Empire and beyond."
The models, say those who have tested them, are adept at answering questions, drafting correspondence, and solving abstruse puzzles. The larger of the pair, GPT-OSS-120B, is particularly nimble in matters of logical reasoning, though both occasionally indulge in what researchers politely call hallucinations — the confident invention of facts.
The open nature of these releases means they may be run upon ordinary computing equipment (albeit of considerable size), adjusted for local needs, or even embedded into novel inventions. Commentators speak of applications in medicine, translation, and education, where machines might lighten the load of human clerks and scholars.
Not all voices are sanguine. Officials within Whitehall whisper concerns about misinformation, industrial displacement, and the use of such ungoverned models by hostile powers. "If the weights are truly open," remarked one civil servant, "then any fellow with sufficient machinery could set up his own artificial newspaper, churning out propaganda at a rate that would make Goebbels blush."
The volte-face is notable. Only earlier this year, OpenAI's chief, Mr. Sam Altman, admitted that his firm had perhaps stood "on the wrong side of history" in resisting open-source practices. With today's release, the company appears to be correcting course, offering the public a share in the machinery of intelligence, though carefully reserving its most advanced engines for proprietary use.
Across Britain, reactions vary from guarded optimism to outright delight. At Lyons Corner House in London, where tea is still poured beside the nation's earliest commercial computer, chatter yesterday turned to the prospect of students conversing with machines over their homework, or engineers summoning instant translations of German patents.
Whether such marvels herald a utopia of efficiency or a dystopia of idle clerks remains to be seen. Yet the fact is plain: as of September 2025, the electronic brains once whispered about in pulp magazines are being handed to the people themselves.
The question, as one editorialist put it this morning, is whether "Britain shall seize the opportunity to lead in this new age of mechanical thought, or whether we shall once again allow the Americans to write the future whilst we sip our tea."